Saniona: Potential for near-term royalties with Tesofensine

Research Update

2023-04-19

10:07

Redeye returns with a view on Tesofensine following the positive opinion of the drug as an obesity treatment in Mexico by the technical committee of its regulatory agency. We raise our base case to again reflect the value of the asset but conclude that we at this stage have little insight into the strategy and commercialization.

FT

Fredrik Thor

Contents

Investment thesis

Quality Rating

Financials

Rating definitions

The team

Download article

A positive surprise

In February, the technical committee of the Mexico Health Authority (COFEPRIS) issued a favorable opinion for Tesofensine, a drug candidate from Saniona that has been out licensed to Medix, a Mexican pharma company and regional leader within the field of obesity, for marketing in Mexico and Argentina since 2016. Medix reported strong phase III results (n=372) in treating obesity back in 2018, where a statistically- and clinically significant weight loss of on average 10% at 24 weeks was demonstrated, and filed for approval in Mexico in 2019. However, the regulatory process has been lengthy, with multiple rounds of review due to outstanding questions. Finally, in 2023, the committee issued a non-binding favorable opinion, which is typically followed by an approval by the Mexican Health Authority. Saniona has stated that it typically can take 6 months to get an approval after a favorable opinion, although it varies.

The market potential

To our knowledge, Medix has not communicated further regarding the remaining path forward and its commercial strategy. Since our last valuation of the asset, we note that there has been some progress in the field, most notably the strong data and attention related to GLP-1 analogues such as liraglutide (Saxenda) and semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy) from Novo Nordisk. Although expensive, we understand that these drugs are priced significanly lower in Mexico and to some degree would be a competitor to Tesofensine. On the other hand, obesity is the country’s most pressing health problem with over 70% of the population being either overweight or obese, and cost remains an issue. Saniona has stated that it expects price to be competitive and we also would like to note that the efficacy of Tesofensine is at least on par with liraglutide and probably a bit lower than semaglutide (although there are no head-to-head trials available). Tesofensine also has the advantage of being a tablet which is more convenient – especially in an outpatient setting. We would expect Medix to position Tesofensine as a more affordable drug compared to the GLP-1 analogues, but likely as a premium product with better efficacy and safety compared to the more affordable (and not so effective) options.

An early valuation

Saniona mentions a market potential of USD150m, but that the market may have fallen back a bit post-covid. This market relates to a fraction of the addressable market in Mexico given its population of 127m (3.7 million treatment months at 40USD per treatment month). At this stage, we assume that Tesofensine in peak sales can take roughly 15-20% of this fraction of the market given Medix strong standing – and assume that sales will start in 2024 and peak 5 years later following the end of data-exclusivity period. We choose only to include Mexico at this stage as we want to know more about Medix’s plans and timeline in Argentina before including it in our valuation. We assume a royalty rate of 14% and a likelihood of approval of 80%. This assumption is a bit more conservative than the average assumptions for a US regulatory process – and relates to Mexico being a less predictable market and that we have less insight into the regulatory process.

Key financials

SEKm20222023e2024e
Revenues15.369.285.1
EBIT-225.7-13.027.7

We want to stress that there are a lot of unknown factors relating to the launch of Tesofensine, and we thus take a careful approach to the asset. We had hoped that we at this stage would know more about the launch - but choose now to give our initial take regardless. We hope to be able to adjust our assumptions further as we know more about the regulatory process and Medix strategy. Currently, we see more value in Saniona’s other assets. Still, we think that a non-dilutive income in the near term is really compelling with Tesofensine, as it could make the company less dependent on the financial market. Today, we still assume that Saniona will do a rights issue in late 2023/early 2024 of SEK 50m, and we adjust our assumptions following the recent rally in the share, resulting in a lower expected dilution. This leads to a new base case at SEK 8.5 per share (6.5). If Saniona can deliver on its ambitious goal of two deals in 2023, which to us would be truly transformative for the company, Saniona could likely have a longer runway. We hope to return with a more extensive take in relation to the report in May.

Investment thesis

Case

Turn Around Case with Plenty of Value

It has been a turbulent year for Saniona, which includes a major restructuring of the management team, stopped clinical studies with Tesomet due to financial difficulties and a refocused strategy towards business development. We see high quality in Saniona’s assets, including its mid-stage orphan drug candidate Tesomet, phase I asset SAN711 (targeting neurophatic pain), and in the long run: its many assets from its Ion Channel Platform. To turn the case around, we argue that a funding solution and/or licensing agreement by H2 2023 and further advancement with phase I candidate SAN711 will be key.

Evidence

Validated Platform and History of Collaborations

The Saniona case offers some unique factors: a validated, target-driven research platform focused on ion channels, including its lead candidate SAN711 that recently presented positive phase I data, combined with Tesomet, a mid-stage asset (phase IIb ready) targeting two rare eating disorders—PWS and HO. Saniona’s research platform has been validated by several collaborations and spinouts over the years, providing non-dilutive funding from upfront payments and milestones – and the current (reinstated) CEO and management team have a proven track record at Saniona: Assuring given the turnaround situation the company is in.

Challenge

Regaining Investors’ and Market Confidence

In retrospect, the company’s pivot towards the US and in-house clinical development, including its high ambitions and expenses, was premature and damaged the reputation of Saniona. Furthermore, the company has lost a few cornerstone institutional investors. We think that the new management team has done the right things lately: Smaller organization, significantly reduced costs and a focus on business development. To further turn the company around, additional execution on its new strategy will be needed.

Challenge

Funding Needs Remain

Even though Saniona has reduced costs by some 75%, the company is still in need of additional funding for its operations and clinical programs. We estimate that the company has a cash runway into H1 2024– and the company has declared that it will focus on non-dilutive funding from partnering. The company has started to turn its reputation around, but strong execution – preferably a licensing deal with a significant upfront payment - would be a major relief. Also, a strong launch of Tesofensine could add further runway.

Valuation

Strong value proposition in Saniona

We largely reiterate our positive stance on Saniona’s clinical drug candidates and research platform, but we see that uncertainty about funding could monopolize investors’ attention in 2023. To turn the case around, we argue that a funding solution and/or licensing agreement by H2 2023 and further advancement with phase I candidate SAN711 will be key in pushing the share toward and beyond our Base Case of SEK 8.5 Per Share.

Quality Rating

People: 3

Business: 3

Financials: 0

Financials

Rating definitions

The team

Disclosures and disclaimers

Premium Plan required to unlock

Unlock companies to access

more high quality research.

Contents

Investment thesis

Quality Rating

Financials

Rating definitions

The team

Download article