Gasporox: Best quarter yet

Research Update

2023-04-28

07:00

Redeye comments on Gasporox Q1'23 report which beat expectations across the board. Gasporox is executing on the long-term opportunity, expanding its geographic reach and product portfolio. We make a slight negative revision to our Q2'23 esimate on the back of the strong Q1'23 report. We reiterate our base case of SEK25.

RJ

Rasmus Jacobsson

Contents

Estimate deviation

Market Size

Development of distributors

High margins on incremental revenues

HMI Software

Valuation and estimate change

Investment thesis

Quality Rating

Financials

Rating definitions

The team

Download article

Three consecutive EBITDA-positive quarters

The report was strong, beating our estimates across the board. Net sales came in 36% higher than expected, while EBITDA was almost five times higher than expected. This marks three consecutive EBITDA-positive quarters. However, we remain cautious about extrapolating the trend as Gasporox had an order backlog of at least SEK8.5m for delivery during H1’23. We suspect a large part of this was delivered in Q1.

Executing its geographic and product expansion strategy

Gasporox continues to expand geographically, primarily in the US, adding three distributors during the quarter and one after the quarter end, according to its LinkedIn page. Most of these remain small with little online presence. Consequently, we do not anticipate a significant immediate impact on Gasporox’s sales from these new partnerships. During the quarter, Gasporox continued to expand its product offering, launching its HMI software due to customer requests. Our view is that the software enhances the comprehensiveness of the product offering and reduces the friction associated with selling machines. Over time, we view additional software as a way to improve Gasporox’s value proposition and increase its product stickiness.

Reiterate base case SEK25

While the report was strong, we believe the strong order backlog contributed to the results, likely resulting in a weaker Q2’23. Thus, we have lowered our Q2’23 net sales estimate by cSEK1.3m. Otherwise, we are keeping our existing estimates. Our base case implies an EV/EBITDA multiple of 13x for 2025e. This aligns with the peer group, which we find is fair. Gasporox is set to showcase a new product, AutoMAP, which will be presented at Interpack in May. This could act as a catalyst for the share. Otherwise, we expect continued strong performance and order announcements to be the main catalysts.

Key financials

SEKm202120222023e2024e2025e
Revenues15.721.432.245.060.8
Revenue Growth26.4%36.3%50.0%40.0%35.0%
EBITDA-2.7-0.905.911.318.0
EBIT-5.4-4.22.75.911.7
EBIT Margin-34.2%-19.7%8.3%13.1%19.3%
Net Income-5.4-4.41.95.19.3
EV/Revenue5.63.83.52.41.7
EV/EBITDA-32.4-90.418.79.75.7

Estimate deviation

Net Sales came in at SEK9.1m, 115% y/y, well ahead of our estimated SEK6.8m (deviation 34%). Sales were broad-based, with both sensors and instruments contributing to the strong results. EBITDA came in at SEK2.7m, corresponding to an EBITDA margin of 30%. Gasporox’s seasonality is decreasing, and has now had three consecutive EBITDA-positive quarters.

Gasporox had an order backlog worth at least cSEK8.5m set for delivery during H1’23. While the report was strong, we think some of the strong results were due to a large part of the order backlog delivered in Q1’23 rather than Q2’23. Thus, we are cautious about extrapolating the results.

Market Size

When assessing the growth potential of a small company, one of the critical aspects naturally becomes the size of the addressable market. According to FMI, the Global Sterile Parenteral Containers Headspace Gas Analyzers market was valued at cUSD66m in 2021. Given Gasporox’s revenue of SEK21.5m in 2022, this would imply a market share of c3%. Although we are positive that an entrant is unlikely to be profitable with a c3% market share, we believe the market is more significant than FMI’s estimates as increasingly strict regulatory requirements shift from at-line to in-line solutions.

Previously, CCIT (Container Closure Integrity Testing) has built on probabilistic tests, where a sample of containers is tested, and the sample results determine whether the whole batch of products is considered safe. This method is only sufficiently reliable for some applications for several reasons, including variations in the technique, sample preparation, and operator variability. It is important to note that there is no way of guaranteeing that the untested part of a batch is safe. With the help of new guidelines - USP1207 and EU GMP Annex 1 in particular - the industry is moving towards deterministic solutions. These solutions test all manufactured products, making it possible to claim with certainty that all delivered products were in the proper condition when they left the production facilities. One example of how regulation drives the market is the current EU Annex 1 guidelines, which stipulate 100% integrity testing for containers closed by fusion, such as glass or plastic ampoules, and for any parenteral products. Suppose companies are to test 100% of the manufactured products. In that case, testing capacity will have to be increased by a factor directly dependent on the share of currently tested products. For example, if 1% of products are currently being tested to generate a sufficient sample size, testing 100% would require a 100x increase in testing capacity. As the at-line testing involves manual labor, this is not practical except for incredibly low-volume, high-value products.

As a result, the shift to deterministic testing methods will require companies to utilize in-line solutions. These generally require more testing units than at-line solutions simply because an at-line solution can serve several product lines simultaneously. Assuming that one at-line instrument can do two to six lines, solely moving to in-line would increase the market by two to six times. Moreover, the number of sensors per line could also increase depending on what the customer wants to measure.

The estimates from FMI build upon at-line solutions being the standard, and as the market is forced in the direction of in-line testing, these figures would be increased by two to six times, resulting in a TAM for Gasporox of cSEK1.3bn-cSEK4.0bn. Suppose we combine this figure with the potential increase in the number of sensors and Gasporox’s higher price point compared to the destructive blue dye tests, which are currently the industry standard. The in-line pharma market could be worth between SEK6.5bn-SEK19.5bn in that case. 

Development of distributors

Gasporox employs distributors for instrument sales. Based on discussions with management, we understand that Gasporox usually tests new by distributors letting them rent or purchase products from Gasporox. Should their performance fail to meet expectations within the initial six to twelve months, Gasporox promptly terminates the partnership.

According to the 2022 annual report, the Company now boasts over 50 resellers, although the precise number and list remain undisclosed. Gasporox introduced three new resellers throughout the quarter and announced an additional one on their LinkedIn page after the quarter’s conclusion. Most of these resellers are situated in the United States, a foreseeable outcome following Gasporox’s engagement of a local consultant to facilitate their entry into the US market. While we acknowledge the potential benefits of new distributors, it is essential to note that most of these distributors are small and have limited or no online presence. Consequently, we do not anticipate a significant immediate impact on Gasporox’s sales from these new partnerships.

High margins on incremental revenues

In the quarter, Gasporox achieved an impressive gross margin of 80%, which peaked at 84% during the fourth quarter of 2021. Furthermore, the Company’s gross profit to asset ratio has consistently risen, reaching 54% in Q1’23 TTM. These figures suggest that Gasporox operates an asset-light business model, with the potential for high returns on capital once profitability is attained.

While these quantitative metrics do not guarantee an asset-light structure or high returns, they appear reasonable when considering the levers available to Gasporox that either lock customers in, reduce the friction to sell additional machines or make the offering more comprehensive.

First, only a small portion of the at-line equipment requires modification to accommodate new form factors. As a result, once customers have implemented the core technology (e.g., bought an initial instrument), Gasporox can sell a small extension that allows for the measurement of additional products. The marginal cost for customers to add new testing capabilities remains low, and Gasporox is likely to maintain strong pricing power in this relationship.

Second, Gasporox can add after-market services such as calibration tests and warranties. The pharmaceutical industry mandates annual calibrations for quality assurance. Thus, Gasporox can supply vials or ampules containing a known gas composition. This allows customers to verify the calibration of their installed machines. The tests incur minimal production costs, yet customers have little choice but to purchase them, granting Gasporox considerable bargaining power in determining prices.

Finally, complementary software presents another potential revenue stream. The software offers opportunities for high-margin incremental sales and encourages customer loyalty to Gasporox’s products. By incorporating software into its product offerings, Gasporox enhances product appeal, streamlines machine sales, and delivers a more comprehensive package. This could enable Gasporox to raise prices over time as customers become accustomed to the software and their data is “locked in” or charge a recurring subscription fee, reflecting its ongoing value to customers.

Each of these levers depends on Gasporox achieving a large install base. Therefore, we believe the best way forward for long-term value creation is for Gasporox to grow its install base as large as possible.

HMI Software

Gasporox tends to develop new products based on customer requests. On March 20, 2023, Gasporox introduced its HMI software which came to be due to customer demand. At the most fundamental level, HMI, or human-machine interface, refers to the part of a machine that handles the interaction with the human user. Gasporox’s software enables the user to operate the Company’s instruments in a way that complies with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and Good Automated Manufacturing Practice (GAMP) guidelines. The software requires no external add-ons and stores the data in an SQL database that has full traceability of the datasets, according to what is prescribed by the CFR21 Part 11 guidelines. Previously, Gasporox had an Excel-based report generator, but the HMI system works as a complement with improved batch handling, audit trail functionality, and recipe management. The software works for all the Company’s instruments.

The inclusion of software offers the potential for incremental sales with high margins and creates an additional opportunity for customers to become committed to Gasporox’s products. We believe the HMI software is free for customers. Thus, we believe its primary advantage lies in enhancing the comprehensiveness of the product offering and reducing the friction associated with selling machines. Senior Application and Sales Manager Roland Koch corroborated this perspective, stating that Gasporox has experienced increased industry demand for a more holistic offering. Moreover, as customers get used to the software, there will be additional friction in shifting suppliers. Over time, this software can likely add further value by simplifying the analysis and data interpretation. Thus, creating value by reducing the time spent on these activities.

Valuation and estimate change

We have observed a noticeable increase in competition. For instance, Bonfiglioli Engineering has introduced the Laser-Pro Headspace Gas Analyzer, which utilizes the same Tunable Laser Diode Absorption Spectroscopy (TLDAS) technology as Gasporox. Furthermore, Bonfiglioli Engineering’s press release states that the device requires less calibration, is easy to configure, and includes a user-friendly interface. It comes with advanced HMI Software that facilitates simple data analysis and interpretation. We believe it is too early to tell how this will affect Gasporox. Although our channel checks indicate many more factors contribute to customers’ selection of equipment than just the technology, such as product availability, responsiveness, and price, it is reasonable that it will increase competition and potentially harm Gasporox’s long-term prospects.

In the quarter, Gasporox had an order backlog worth at least cSEK8.5m set for delivery during H1’23. We believe most of this order backlog was delivered during Q1’23. Thus, we expect Q2’23 to be weaker. Accordingly, we have lowered our Q2’23 net sales estimate by cSEK1.3m. Otherwise, our estimates are unchanged.

On the back of three different scenarios, using a DCF valuation, we reiterate our fair value range of SEK12-SEK45 with a base case of SEK25.

Compared to peers selected due to their financial outlook and similar business characteristics, Gasporox is trading at an EV/EBITDA discount on 2024e-2025e while on a premium for 2023e. Our base case implies an EV/EBITDA multiple of 13x on 2025e which aligns with peers.

Investment thesis

Case

High incremental return

Gasporox is changing the market for quality assurance and testing in headspace analysis (HSA) and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), moving away from the often destructive sample-based and manual tests (known as at-line tests) and toward testing all products directly on the production line in a non-destructive manner (known as in-line tests). Given the existing core technology, the economics of incremental products (i.e., line extensions) should be excellent. However, because the company is still developing its distribution and sales channels, we believe this is not yet fully transparent. We believe that once these are in place, Gasporox will achieve high returns on incremental capital, similar to what Colgate-Palmolive, Coca-Cola, Unilever, and Nestlé have done in their respective industries.

Evidence

Robust growth and customer interest

Over the last five years, the company's revenue has increased by 47% (or a 66% CAGR excluding the pandemic years of 2020-2021). The company's sales and support teams' productivity has increased as a result of a simplified offering, with installations now possible via over-the-phone support rather than physical presence. Furthermore, end-users have begun to request that the product be installed by themselves rather than by a typical machine integrator, demonstrating the simplicity of Gasporox's offering, which should allow for rapid scalability.

Supportive Analysis

Although Gasporox's in-line testing solution requires three to twelve times the number of sensors as an at-line test, and each sensor costs about twice as much, increasing investment costs by six to twenty-four times, customers still find Gasporox's value proposition compelling. Furthermore, the total cost of a machine with integrated sensors may be 50 to 100 times that of the at-line option, and yet end customers continue to purchase the offering. Gasporox is still unprofitable, but its gross profit to asset ratio has steadily improved since going public, rising from 3% in 2016 to 52% TTM Q3'22. This implies increased profitability and a high return on invested capital is possible. We expect EBIT break-even in 2022.

Challenge

Biting off More Than it Can Chew

Gasporox is a small company with only a few employees. The company targets pharma, food, and beverages. Gasporox may overextend itself in the food and beverage markets, despite their potential. For instance, a few years ago, it had one salesperson (two if you counted the CEO) handling global pharmaceutical and food sales. Gasporox has added sales heads for pharma and food, but its size may cause it to lose focus. If necessary, the company can pivot into an end-segment to succeed.

Challenge

Untested Expansion

Since 2016, Gasporox has focused on pharmaceutical growth. It wants to expand into food. However, execution remains critical, and in some markets, such as the United Kingdom, where supermarkets typically drive which packaging formats are used, there is a trend toward skin packs and vacuum packaging, where Gasporox may not be able to provide as much value. If vacuum packaging becomes mainstream, Gasporox may switch to other leak inspection methods. Vacuum only works on durable products, so pre-made meals and salads will always need MAP. Last, a successful food market expansion is not necessary for the Gasporox investment case, but it makes the difference between a good and a great investment.

Valuation

Growth Runway Not Priced In

We value Gasporox on the back of three difference DCF-scenarios. Our fair value range is SEK12-45 per share with a Base Case of SEK25. We use a discount rate of 10.5% based on Redeye’s rating model.

Quality Rating

People: 3

CEO Märta Lewander Xu, who joined Gasporox in 2011, has a Ph.D. in laser absorption spectroscopy of gas in scattering media. Her technical background aids Gasporox's application. The board is well-balanced and most large shareholders are active board members. We are encouraged by management's increased ownership.

 

Business: 3

Strategic partnerships and an asset-light business model earn three points for the Company. Gasporox also has a strong customer value proposition and a long growth runway. Last, we expect this score to rise as we learn more about Gasporox's expansion in the food and beverage sectors and as its installed base grows and its aftermarket services generate more recurring revenues.

 

Financials: 3

Gasporox has seen strong revenue growth since its IPO and has a fantastic gross margin that exceeds 70%. The company loses points because it's still unprofitable. We expect this score to rise as the Company becomes profitable.

 

Financials

Income statement
SEKm2020202120222023e2024e
Revenues12.515.721.432.245.0
Cost of Revenue3.85.04.77.511.3
Operating Expenses15.922.026.427.230.5
EBITDA-1.1-2.7-0.905.911.3
Depreciation0.060.120.290.420.61
Amortizations3.22.53.04.24.8
EBIT-4.4-5.4-4.22.75.9
Shares in Associates0.000.000.000.000.00
Interest Expenses0.000.00-0.17-0.75-0.78
Net Financial Items0.000.000.180.750.78
EBT-4.4-5.4-4.03.46.7
Income Tax Expenses0.000.000.000.000.00
Net Income-4.4-5.4-4.41.95.1
Balance sheet
Assets
Non-current assets
SEKm2020202120222023e2024e
Property, Plant and Equipment (Net)0.270.701.21.82.5
Goodwill0.000.000.000.000.00
Intangible Assets10.313.716.918.720.0
Right-of-Use Assets0.000.000.000.000.00
Other Non-Current Assets0.000.000.000.000.00
Total Non-Current Assets10.614.418.120.522.5
Current assets
SEKm2020202120222023e2024e
Inventories2.43.95.44.87.1
Accounts Receivable2.63.44.56.69.3
Other Current Assets1.31.41.93.95.4
Cash Equivalents24.214.314.614.016.4
Total Current Assets30.623.026.329.238.2
Total Assets41.137.444.449.760.7
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
SEKm2020202120222023e2024e
Non Controlling Interest0.000.000.000.000.00
Shareholder's Equity34.128.624.426.431.5
Non-current liabilities
SEKm2020202120222023e2024e
Long Term Debt0.000.008.48.48.4
Long Term Lease Liabilities0.000.000.000.000.00
Other Long Term Liabilities0.931.00.850.850.85
Total Non-Current Liabilities0.931.09.39.39.3
Current liabilities
SEKm2020202120222023e2024e
Short Term Debt0.000.000.000.000.00
Short Term Lease Liabilities0.000.000.000.000.00
Accounts Payable1.32.02.42.53.7
Other Current Liabilities0.150.380.4311.616.2
Total Current Liabilities6.17.710.714.119.9
Total Liabilities and Equity41.137.444.449.760.7
Cash flow
SEKm2020202120222023e2024e
Operating Cash Flow-0.64-3.4-1.26.49.8
Investing Cash Flow-5.4-6.5-7.0-7.0-7.4
Financing Cash Flow18.00.048.50.000.00

Rating definitions

The team

Disclosures and disclaimers

Premium Plan required to unlock

Unlock companies to access

more high quality research.

Contents

Estimate deviation

Market Size

Development of distributors

High margins on incremental revenues

HMI Software

Valuation and estimate change

Investment thesis

Quality Rating

Financials

Rating definitions

The team

Download article