Avensia: Positive Trend in Utilization Rates
Research Update
2023-07-19
06:45
Redeye retains its positive view of Avensia despite a soft Q2, with sales and EBIT below our expectations. Although Q2 was hurt by low utilization, Avensia experienced a gradual improvement during the quarter thanks to personnel reductions and a stabilized market. While we somewhat cut our forecast and Base Case, we still expect significant margin improvements mid-term, and we believe the case is intact.
FN
JS
Fredrik Nilsson
Jacob Svensson
Contents
Review of Q2 2023
Sales: Hurt by Low Utilization Rates
Number of Employees: Reductions to Increase Utilization Rates
Per Employee and Working Day Data: Hurt by Low Utilization Rates
OPEX: SEK70m in Yearly Cost Reduction to Come
Profit and Cash Flow: Soft EBIT, Strong Cash flow
Estimate Revisions: Downward Revisions for 2023 and 2024
Valuation
Investment Case
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article
Sales fell by 8% y/y and was 11% below our expectations. EBIT, adjusted for SEK4.8m in restructuring costs, was SEK-1,8m (0.7), corresponding to an EBIT margin of -1.8% (0.6). Our forecast was SEK5.7m and 4.9%. A soft Sales-COGS/employees/working day due to low utilization rates hurt both sales and EBIT. As seen in recent quarters, weak e-commerce sales have reduced customers’ willingness to invest.
On the other hand, the utilization rate improved gradually during the quarter due to Avensia reducing its capacity and a stabilizing market, although still below normal levels in terms of activity. Considering those factors, we believe Avensia is heading back to profitable territory H2 2023, followed by gradual margin improvements.
We reduced our Base Case somewhat to SEK13 (14) following the decreased forecasts. We expect negative EBIT for the full-year 2023 and cut our 2024 EBIT forecast by 20% while still assuming a substantial improvement next year. However, we believe the case, where we expect Avensia to regain its status as a profitable consulting firm, is intact.
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Revenues | 431.5 | 417.4 | 427.7 | 464.6 | 483.5 |
Revenue Growth | 10.6% | -3.3% | 2.5% | 8.6% | 4.1% |
EBITDA | 1.8 | 7.8 | 32.8 | 54.1 | 56.3 |
EBIT | -13.0 | -4.4 | 23.8 | 46.6 | 49.9 |
EBIT Margin | -3.0% | -1.1% | 5.6% | 10.0% | 10.3% |
Net Income | -12.1 | -4.4 | 18.9 | 37.0 | 39.6 |
EV/Revenue | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
EV/EBIT | -34.6 | -69.1 | 11.6 | 5.3 | 4.7 |
Estmates vs. Actuals | ||||||
Sales | Q2E 2023 | Q2A 2023 | Diff | Q2A 2022 | Q1A 2022 | |
Net sales | 115.2 | 102.1 | -11% | 110.5 | 116.8 | |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 4% | -8% | 13% | 26% | ||
Sales-COGS/employees/working day | 4,746 | 4,346 | -8% | 4,944 | 5,105 | |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -4% | -15% | 12% | 15% | ||
Contribtuion/employee/working day | 1,138 | 532 | -53% | 1,146 | 1,304 | |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -1% | -59% | 38% | 57% | ||
OPEX | ||||||
Cost of revenues | -13.0 | -9.4 | -28% | -13.3 | -12.3 | |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -3% | -9% | -12% | -11% | ||
Other external costs | -11.3 | -9.9 | -12% | -14.7 | -14.3 | |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -23% | -32% | 85% | 126% | ||
Personnel expenses | -83.0 | -86.9 | 5% | -78.4 | -77.8 | |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 6% | 11% | 17% | 19% | ||
Earnings | ||||||
EBIT | 5.7 | -1.8 | nmf | 0.7 | 9.8 | |
EBIT Margin (%) | 4.9% | -1.8% | 0.6% | 8.4% | ||
Diluted EPS | 0.12 | -0.15 | nmf | 0.00 | 0.19 |
Sales fell by 8% y/y and was 11% below our expectations. The sales to new and current customers was lower than last year, resulting in a lower utilization rate. As seen in recent quarters, weak e-commerce sales have reduced customers’ willingness to invest. However, Avensia believes it has gained market share. Also, the utilization rate improved gradually during the quarter due to a combination of Avensia reducing its capacity and a stabilized market, although still below normal levels in terms of activity.
Source: Avensia
An IT consultant’s sales are a function of the number of employees and their revenue per working day. In reality, the number of revenue-generating employees, i. e., excluding administrative personnel etc., would be a better measure. However, we cannot access those figures, making the total number of employees a reasonable proxy.
The number of employees at the end of the quarter increased to 354 (330), corresponding to a y/y growth of 7%. Sequentially, the number of employees decreased by 15, and our forecast was -4. The reduction in employees sequentially follows Avensia’s cost savings program as well as natural employee churn being left unreplaced. However, the latest cost savings, announced in late June, of SEK25 and 25 employees (about 2/3 revenue-generating employees) are not affecting this quarter’s number of employees. Thus, we expect -25 in Q3 2023. The cost savings program aims to adjust Avensia’s capacity to ensure healthy utilization rates.
Source: Avensia, Redeye
The number of employees at the end of the quarter is a leading indicator for sales growth in the coming quarter. While sales is dependent on other parameters as well, the starting number of employees for the coming quarter is, together with the number of working days, the only relevant figures we know in advance.
Source: Avensia, Redeye
The Sales-COGS/employees/working day is a proxy for the revenue generation of one employee during one working day, indicating how advanced services the company provides and how high its utilisation rate is. While sub-consultants and reselling software can alter accuracy in this measure, we try to consider that by subtracting the cost of goods sold, which typically consists mainly of expenses related to sub-consultants and reselling. Also, as we use the total number of employees, the share of administrative personnel can alter the number. A high share of administrative personnel might not be unwanted. For example, when focusing on expansion, the investments in administration are typically front-loaded.
The Contribution/employee/working day is sales-cogs-personnel expenses and indicates the profit contribution for the average employee per working day. We believe it is a proxy of how much revenue consultants generate compared to their seniority and, thus, salary. For example, a high Sales-COGS/employees/working day might not be worth much to shareholders if most are paid as salaries to senior consultants.
Overall, OPEX roughly matched our forecast of SEK107m and was SEK106m (106). Other external costs was lower compared to our expectations. Personnel expenses came in above our forecasts as the cost per employee was slightly higher than we expected due to the restructuring program. Following the two cost savings programs announced in 2023, Avensia costs will decline by SEK70m on a full-year basis, all else equal. We assume the cost base in Q4 2022 equals yearly costs of about SEK450m, which implies about SEK380m in costs in its current operations. For 2024, we expect SEK396m, as we assume some cost increases due to salary inflation, for example
Source: Avensia
EBIT, adjusted for SEK4.8m in restructuring costs, was SEK-1,8m (0.7), corresponding to an EBIT margin of -1.8% (0.6). Our forecast was SEK5.7m and 4.9%, and the miss was mainly due to softer sales. Despite the negative EBIT, free cash flow was SEK14m, thanks to a strong contribution from net working capital.
By the end of the quarter, Avensia had a net cash position of SEK19m.
Source: Avensia
As common among IT consultants, Avensia has low CAPEX, and the cash conversion tends to be strong.
We believe 2023 will be a lost year in terms of profit, although we expect positive EBIT during H2. We lowered our sales and predominantly EBIT forecasts, partly due to the soft outcome in Q2.
Regarding 2024, we still expect a significant rebound relative to 2023, although lowering our forecasts somewhat. Considering the reduction of employees, we adjust our sales forecasts accordingly. As mentioned above, we expect a cost reduction of SEK55m y/y on a full-year basis. Avensia implicitly guides for SEK70m in reduced cost, all else equal, but we expect some cost inflation simultaneously. Overall, we lower our EBIT forecast for 2024 by 19% due to lower sales and a slightly lower margin assumption.
For the long run, we still expect Avensia to reach EBIT margins of ~10%. However, we expect it will take somewhat longer to get there.
Estimate Revisions | ||||||
Sales | FYE 2023 | Old | Change | FYE 2024 | Old | Change |
Net sales | 417.4 | 445.9 | -6% | 427.7 | 467.9 | -9% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -3% | 3% | 2% | 5% | ||
Sales-COGS/employees/working day | 4,189 | 4299.0 | -3% | 4,691 | 4600 | 2% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -3% | 0% | 12% | 7% | ||
Contribtuion/employee/working day | 514 | 723 | -29% | 925 | 935 | -1% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -32% | -5% | 80% | 29% | ||
Cost of revenues | -46.2 | -49.8 | -7% | -48.5 | -52.3 | -7% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -8% | 0% | 5% | 5% | ||
Other external costs | -41.2 | -44.4 | -7% | -41.9 | -45.9 | -9% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -40% | -35% | 2% | 3% | ||
Personnel expenses | -324.3 | -328.2 | -1% | -305.6 | -332.5 | -8% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 4% | 5% | -6% | 1% | ||
Earnings | ||||||
EBIT | -4.4 | 13.7 | nmf | 23.8 | 29.3 | -19% |
EBIT Margin (%) | -1.1% | 3.1% | 5.6% | 6.3% | ||
Diluted EPS | -0.12 | 0.28 | nmf | 0.51 | 0.63 | -19% |
Forecasts | ||||||||
Sales | Q1A 2023 | Q2A 2023 | Q3E 2023 | Q4E 2023 | FYE 2023 | FYE 2024 | FYE 2025 | FYE 2026 |
Net sales | 112.7 | 102.1 | 91.6 | 110.9 | 417.4 | 427.7 | 464.6 | 483.5 |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -4% | -8% | -1% | -1% | -3% | 2% | 9% | 4% |
Sales-COGS/employees/working day | 4,206 | 4,346 | 3,600 | 4,660 | 4,189 | 4,691 | 5,067 | 5,193 |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -18% | -12% | 0% | 12% | -3% | 12% | 8% | 2% |
Contribtuion/employee/working day | 283 | 532 | 475 | 848 | 514 | 925 | 1,206 | 1,236 |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -78% | -54% | 7% | 143% | -32% | 80% | 30% | 2% |
OPEX | ||||||||
Cost of revenues | -12.3 | -9.4 | -10.5 | -14.0 | -46.2 | -48.5 | -50.9 | -52.9 |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 0% | -29% | -1% | 2% | -8% | 5% | 5% | 4% |
Other external costs | -12.5 | -9.9 | -8.2 | -10.5 | -41.2 | -41.9 | -45.5 | -47.4 |
Y/Y Growth (%) | -13% | -32% | -30% | -62% | -40% | 2% | 9% | 4% |
Personnel expenses | -92.2 | -86.9 | -67.2 | -78.1 | -324.3 | -305.6 | -315.2 | -328.1 |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 18% | 11% | -2% | -12% | 4% | -6% | 3% | 4% |
Earnings | ||||||||
EBIT | -7.5 | -6.6 | 3.5 | 6.3 | -4.4 | 23.8 | 46.6 | 49.9 |
EBIT Margin (%) | -6.7% | -6.5% | 3.8% | 5.7% | -1.1% | 5.6% | 10.0% | 10.3% |
Diluted EPS | -0.18 | -0.15 | 0.07 | 0.13 | -0.12 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 1.07 |
We reduced our Base Case somewhat to SEK13 (14) following the decreased forecasts. However, we believe the case, where we expect Avensia to regain its status as a profitable consulting firm, is intact.
Avensia is trading at some discount to the peer average and median on 2025e. We believe the market does not agree with our assumption of the EBIT margin reaching 10% in 2025e. If Avensia achieves this, we expect it to trade at an EV/EBIT multiple, at least in line with the peer average. Also, most IT consulting firms have seen their valuation multiples declining lately, likely due to fears of a weakening economy.
Case
Pioneering e-commerce integrator set to rebound
Evidence
Proven track record and solid customer list
Challenge
When will e-commerce rebound?
Challenge
What is left for shareholders?
Valuation
Fair value: SEK13
People: 4
Avensia receives a high rating for people for several reasons. First, we believe the company has clear and honest communications. Second, it is owner-operated, with CEO Robin Gustafsson as one of the co-founders and largest shareholders. Other major owners are active on the board. Third, we believe Mr Gustafsson and his team have deep knowledge and experience in the e-commerce sector.
Business: 3
Avensia receives an average Business Rating for the following reasons. First, it is an asset-light business model with strong cash flows. Second, Avensia serves a genuine need as it helps its customers to build top-notch e-commerce solutions, increasing their sales. Third, Avensia focuses solely on e-commerce and customers willing to spend on a high-class solution. However, the business model’s heavy dependence on its employees hinders Avensia from reaching a higher rating.
Financials: 2
Avensia receives a below-average Financials rating mostly due to its weak financial performance in recent quarters. Should Avensia perform in line with our forecast, reaching ~10% EBIT margin in 2025, its Financials rating would improve to 3–4 over time. Also, Avensia has no debt, and the business can grow with very limited capital.
Income statement | |||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Revenues | 431.5 | 417.4 | 427.7 | 464.6 | 483.5 |
Cost of Revenue | 50.0 | 46.2 | 48.5 | 50.9 | 52.9 |
Operating Expenses | 379.8 | 363.3 | 346.3 | 359.6 | 374.3 |
EBITDA | 1.8 | 7.8 | 32.8 | 54.1 | 56.3 |
Depreciation | 3.2 | 1.9 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 1.0 |
Amortizations | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.27 |
EBIT | -13.0 | -4.4 | 23.8 | 46.6 | 49.9 |
Shares in Associates | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Interest Expenses | -1.1 | -0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Net Financial Items | 1.3 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
EBT | -13.8 | -5.0 | 23.8 | 46.6 | 49.9 |
Income Tax Expenses | 1.7 | 0.54 | -4.9 | -9.6 | -10.3 |
Net Income | -12.1 | -4.4 | 18.9 | 37.0 | 39.6 |
Balance sheet | |||||
Assets | |||||
Non-current assets | |||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Property, Plant and Equipment (Net) | 11.4 | 12.4 | 15.1 | 18.0 | 20.9 |
Goodwill | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Intangible Assets | 3.7 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
Right-of-Use Assets | 45.7 | 39.9 | 31.9 | 25.5 | 20.4 |
Other Non-Current Assets | 5.1 | 11.1 | 11.1 | 11.1 | 11.1 |
Total Non-Current Assets | 67.8 | 67.7 | 62.1 | 58.3 | 55.8 |
Current assets | |||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Inventories | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Accounts Receivable | 99.6 | 91.8 | 94.1 | 102.2 | 106.4 |
Other Current Assets | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Cash Equivalents | 15.4 | 19.3 | 47.9 | 75.5 | 89.0 |
Total Current Assets | 115.0 | 111.2 | 142.0 | 177.7 | 195.3 |
Total Assets | 182.8 | 178.9 | 204.1 | 235.9 | 251.1 |
Equity and Liabilities | |||||
Equity | |||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Non Controlling Interest | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Shareholder's Equity | 30.4 | 23.9 | 46.4 | 68.2 | 78.3 |
Non-current liabilities | |||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Long Term Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Long Term Lease Liabilities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Long Term Liabilities | 41.5 | 42.2 | 42.2 | 42.2 | 42.2 |
Total Non-Current Liabilities | 41.5 | 42.2 | 42.2 | 42.2 | 42.2 |
Current liabilities | |||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Short Term Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Short Term Lease Liabilities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Accounts Payable | 110.8 | 112.7 | 115.5 | 125.4 | 130.5 |
Other Current Liabilities | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Current Liabilities | 110.9 | 112.7 | 115.5 | 125.4 | 130.5 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | 182.8 | 178.9 | 204.1 | 235.9 | 251.1 |
Cash flow | |||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Operating Cash Flow | 15.1 | 12.4 | 28.4 | 46.4 | 47.0 |
Investing Cash Flow | -0.99 | -2.5 | -3.4 | -3.7 | -3.9 |
Financing Cash Flow | -35.7 | -5.6 | 3.6 | -15.1 | -29.6 |
Disclosures and disclaimers
Contents
Review of Q2 2023
Sales: Hurt by Low Utilization Rates
Number of Employees: Reductions to Increase Utilization Rates
Per Employee and Working Day Data: Hurt by Low Utilization Rates
OPEX: SEK70m in Yearly Cost Reduction to Come
Profit and Cash Flow: Soft EBIT, Strong Cash flow
Estimate Revisions: Downward Revisions for 2023 and 2024
Valuation
Investment Case
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article