Nepa: Set to recover already in 2024
Research Update
2023-11-21
07:25
Redeye believes Nepa is executing according to its plan to restore profitability. With cost savings exceeding the previously announced target and a market that appears to have bottomed out, Nepa is set to generate healthy cash flows already next year. Redeye estimates Nepa to be trading at an attractive 5x FCF multiple for 2024e, and 4x for 2025e. Also, with a new, still unknown 14%-stake shareholder, Redeye speculates in a possible bid on Nepa. Redeye raises its estimates and its valuation range.
JVK
FR
Jesper Von Koch
Fredrik Reuterhäll
Contents
Investment thesis
Review of Q3
Subscriptions: Some churn from smaller clients, but positive efforts on ARPU and new sales
Ad-hoc revenues well ahead of expectations – especially to subscription clients
Cost base to be lower than SEK220m in 2024 – ahead of previous plans
SEK5.3 in net cash per share
Outlook: Lower cost base from Q1 – then focus on profitable growth
Changes to financial estimates
Valuation
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article
Nepa’s Q3 report was stronger than we had expected. Revenues beat our estimates by 13%, whereas the adjusted EBIT margin beat estimates by 5.2 percentage points. Particularly, ad-hoc revenues to subscription clients were significantly higher than we expected. Nepa also stated that the market appears to have bottomed out during Q3 and that the company expects improvements ahead.
Nepa also announced that its cost savings program is developing ahead of previously planned – implying that the total cost base in 2024 will be lower than SEK220m. Combined with the market turning more favorable, we believe Nepa is set for a strong 2024 financial performance.
On 2 October, two significant block transactions were made in Nepa, corresponding to 15.6% of the outstanding shares. The block was divided into one block of c14.1% and one of 1.5%. While funds from Cliens and Swedbank sold their shares, the principal buyer is still unknown. A plausible reason for buying such a stake and remaining anonymous is that the player would be planning to make a bid on Nepa. Naturally, this is just pure speculation from our side, but we would not be surprised if a bid on Nepa were to come.
Following the Q3 report, Redeye raises its estimates on revenues by 3-4% and EBIT by 15-30% for 2024-2026e. Redeye estimates Nepa to be trading at 5x and 4x FCF for 2024e and 2025e respectively. As a result of higher interest rates, Redeye raises its WACC from 12.0% to 12.5%. Following our changes, we maintain our Base Case of SEK50 and Bull Case of SEK80, while we raise our Bear Case from SEK20 to SEK24.
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Revenues | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Revenue Growth | 14.2% | 5.7% | -4.2% | 5.5% | 7.4% |
EBIT | 40.0 | 19.7 | -7.7 | 34.3 | 35.5 |
EBIT Margin | 13.5% | 6.3% | -2.6% | 10.9% | 10.5% |
Net Income | 38.6 | 17.5 | -8.4 | 28.5 | 28.8 |
EV/Revenue | 4.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
EV/EBIT | 30.1 | 6.1 | -18.2 | 3.3 | 2.5 |
P/E | 33.4 | 10.5 | -22.1 | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Case
Sticky, recurring software revenues with pending margin expansion
Evidence
Cost-savings program underway
Challenge
Historically weak cost control
Valuation
Scalable software priced as a poorly run consultancy
Total revenue was SEK71m, +2% y/y, and 13% above our estimates of SEK63m. Stronger ad-hoc sales explain the whole deviation. The more qualitative part of ad-hoc revenues (to existing subscription clients) outperformed our estimates the most.
EBIT adjusted for one-off restructuring costs was SEK0.6m - SEK3.3m better than expected, or 5.2 percentage points better. Capitalized development expenses were also below estimates, implying that the underlying beat on cash flow was even stronger.
SEKm | Q3'23A | Q3'23E | Last year | Beat/ miss | Y/Y |
Net sales | 70.6 | 62.7 | 69.5 | 13% | 2% |
- of which Recurring | 44.7 | 45.2 | 40.8 | -1% | 10% |
- of which Ad-hoc | 25.9 | 17.4 | 28.7 | 49% | -10% |
Gross margin | 73.6% | 72.3% | 74.7% | 1pp | -1pp |
EBIT | -0.5 | -2.7 | 4.9 | -82% | -110% |
EBIT margin | -1% | -4% | 7% | 4pp | -8pp |
Adj. EBIT | 0.6 | -2.7 | 4.9 | -122% | -88% |
Adj. EBIT margin | 1% | -4% | 7% | 5pp | -6pp |
Source: Nepa
Subscription revenues came in roughly in line with the last quarter – and in line with our estimates. Recurring revenues amounted to SEK45m (+10% y/y) and accounted for 63% of sales in the quarter.
During Q3, Nepa experienced an uplift in churn. The company explained that clients have, to a higher extent, paused their subscriptions or reducing the scope of them. However, it should be noted that the churn was caused by clients pausing rather than switching to a competitor. Churn was particularly higher for smaller clients, whereas larger clients remained loyal despite tougher economic conditions. This caused a sequential drop in ARR of 1.1% (SEK172.4).
Nepa states that it is working to extend its cancellation notice period for clients from its previous one-to-three months to twelve months and above.
Just more than one year ago, Nepa started, for the first time ever, to initiate outbound sales efforts. This has, as is typically the case, so far only implied extra expenses for Nepa whereas topline so far has not been positively impacted. However, the interim CEO stated in the conference call that while sales cycles have been long due to the economic climate, the sales pipeline should soon start convert into new subscription contracts.
In its sales efforts, Nepa has targeted large multinational companies, which offer substantial potential in boosting the average revenue per client (ARPC). Rather than going for clients with a base in Sweden, Nepa is focusing on more global clients that can be handled from distance, which implies that there is no immediate need for a new office in that market. Sales efforts towards UK clients (where Nepa already has an office) are developing quite well with some new clients signed and additional clients soon likely to follow.
While the sales efforts now appear to start bearing fruit, Nepa stated that it will need to invest in more experienced sales personnel.
In the quarter, Nepa launched a new add-on product to its Brand Tracker, the “AI Trend Boost”. This product uses machine learning to draw conclusions in a way that would otherwise have required a data set five times as big. Except for needing less data per insight, this enables new use cases where the data available has previously been too scarce.
Nepa states that the AI Trend Boost is an excellent product to offer to all existing clients. The company commented that the initial response from clients has been very strong, and that it expects the product to boost sales in the coming quarters. Considering that the product does not require additional data, it means extra software revenue without the need for extra data costs. This implies that a substantial revenue contribution from this product will boost the gross margin.
The following interesting image was presented in the conference call by Nepa, providing an overview of its product roadmap and what the various features aim to accomplish:
Source: Nepa
Currently, almost all Nepa’s ARR comes from its Brand Tracker. Within Marketing Optimization, Nepa also offers “marketing mix modeling”, or MMM, as an ad-hoc product. The company is now planning to enable this product as a subscription product – and is currently conducting pilots with clients with promising results. Nepa expects a full rollout of this product in Q2 or early Q3 next year.
Nepa recently analyzed its outcomes on RfPs (request for proposal). As a direct consequence, the company has restructured its way of selling and packaging its products. Before, Nepa used to offer a rather complex product with the option for clients to ask for substantial customization – which entailed more resources needed for client implementation and a higher selling price.
This customization was appreciated by some clients, but it also created confusion about what Nepa stands for and its main value proposition for others, including the own marketing department. In several cases, it also made Nepa’s solution appear expensive, causing a loss of that tender.
Nepa has now started to offer a clearer and more streamlined product – rather than a customized solution. The product should be standardized and cover 90% of the clients’ needs. This means that it becomes cheaper for clients, fewer employees needed for onboarding, and clearer for Nepa’s marketing department in how to position Nepa.
Ad-hoc revenues amounted to SEK26m (-10% y/y) and accounted for 37% of sales in the quarter. Ad-hoc from clients amounted to SEK15.3m, +59% y/y and 59% above our estimates. Ad-hoc sales to non-subscription clients amounted to SEK10.6m, -45% y/y and 20% above our estimates. As such, it was the more qualitative part of ad-hoc revenues (to existing subscription clients) that outperformed our estimates the most.
Nepa mentions the UK as an important reason for the somewhat stronger figure. Historically, very large ad-hoc projects have been conducted by UK clients, and they typically come back to redo the project every two to three years. These clients were, however, on pause during H1 but are now showing good progress.
Looking at the +59% y/y growth, the performance from this part appears impressive. However, it is worth noting that the increase came from low numbers. As such, it could be looked at as ‘normalized’ rather than ‘heightened’. Nevertheless, the increase originated from sales focus on larger clients since the start of the year.
The company also stated that the increase came from a combination of increased semi-recurring revenues and pure one-off revenues.
Nepa has in the past quarters experienced a tougher market climate for certain high-margin ad hoc projects, predominantly in the UK. The company now believes the market bottomed out during Q3 and that improvements are on their way. Some improvements were seen already late in the quarter, resulting in several project wins yet to be realized (in Q4, we believe).
OPEX excl. one-off restructuring costs amounted to SEK47.7m and CAPEX to SEK4.3m, implying a total cost base of SEK51.8m.
More importantly, the average number of employees decreased sequentially from 303 to 281 – however, the number of employees at the end of Q3 was as low as c270, according to Nepa. This number peaked in Q4 2022 of 325 and has now thus been reduced by at least 17% (the peak was likely a bit higher than the average in Q4’22).
Additional cost savings continued after the quarter. Nepa is now finding more effective ways of working, and is becoming better at moving internal resources between markets to improve utilization rate of its consultants.
Nepa has most of its employees in Stockholm but some in India. The company started this summer to move more work to teams in India. Nepa wants to have high value-add consultants in Stockholm and moving much of the rest to India. The target is thus to get the same work performed but at a lower cost. Nepa states that it is now set to beat the previously targeted cost base for other external costs and personnel costs of SEK220 million in 2024. The SEK220m cost base appeared like the run rate going into Q4, whereas the full cost savings will be seen in Q1’24.
Source: Nepa
Adjusting for the extra dividend paid during Q3 (SEK5.2m, or SEK0.67 per share), cash flow was positive SEK2m, partly resulting from improved net working capital. By the end of Q3, net cash amounted to SEK42m or SEK5.3 per share.
At the end of Q3, Nepa started experiencing a better market climate for ad-hoc sales to non-subscribers, resulting in some deals yet to be realized as revenues. Nepa further states that the market likely bottomed out in Q3, implying improvements ahead.
The full effect of the cost-savings program is not yet visible in the cost base, and we expect a lower cost base in Q4, and that full effect is expected from the start of Q1.
The interim CEO stated that it is ‘pretty much there’ in terms of being a slim and trim organization. Next year will be more focus on revenue and profitable growth.
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | Q1 23 | Q2 23 | Q3 23 | Q4 23E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E |
Total net sales | 295 | 312 | 73 | 75 | 71 | |||||
New | 81 | 299 | 316 | 339 | 364 | |||||
Old | 76 | 287 | 306 | 329 | 354 | |||||
Change | 6% | 4% | 3% | 3% | 3% | |||||
Gross margin | 78% | 76% | 73% | 74% | 74% | |||||
New | 75% | 74% | 74% | 74% | 75% | |||||
Old | 72% | 73% | 73% | 74% | 75% | |||||
Change | 2% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 0% | |||||
OPEX | 198 | 239 | 61 | 69 | 55 | |||||
New | 56 | 241 | 211 | 226 | 240 | |||||
Old | 55 | 236 | 211 | 226 | 240 | |||||
Change | 2% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||||
EBITDA | 50 | 31 | -1 | -6 | 3 | |||||
New | 10 | 6 | 49 | 52 | 61 | |||||
Old | 6 | 0 | 41 | 47 | 54 | |||||
Change | 57% | 5120% | 20% | 11% | 14% | |||||
EBIT | 40 | 20 | -4 | -10 | 0 | |||||
New | 7 | -8 | 34 | 36 | 43 | |||||
Old | 3 | -13 | 26 | 31 | 36 | |||||
Change | 114% | -43% | 30% | 15% | 19% | |||||
EBIT (%) | 14% | 6% | -5% | -13% | -1% | |||||
New | 8% | -3% | 11% | 10% | 12% | |||||
Old | 4% | -5% | 9% | 9% | 10% | |||||
Change | 4% | 2% | 2% | 1% | 2% |
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | Q1 23 | Q2 23 | Q3 23 | Q4 23E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E |
Net sales | 295 | 312 | 73 | 75 | 71 | 81 | 299 | 316 | 339 | 364 |
- Subscriptions | 148 | 170 | 43 | 45 | 45 | 46 | 178 | 190 | 207 | 228 |
- Ad hoc from subs | 76 | 67 | 17 | 20 | 15 | 21 | 73 | 76 | 80 | 82 |
- Ad hoc from others | 71 | 75 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 48 | 49 | 52 | 53 |
Gross Profit | 231 | 236 | 53 | 56 | 52 | 60 | 221 | 234 | 251 | 271 |
EBITDA | 50 | 31 | -1 | -6 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 49 | 52 | 61 |
EBIT | 40.0 | 19.7 | -3.9 | -9.7 | -0.5 | 6.5 | -7.7 | 34.3 | 35.5 | 43.1 |
EPS (SEK) | 4.9 | 2.2 | -0.6 | -1.1 | -0.1 | 0.7 | -1.1 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 4.3 |
EBITDA - CAPEX (EBITDAC) | 39.4 | 3.9 | (7.4) | (11.9) | (1.1) | 5.2 | (15.3) | 28.2 | 30.7 | 37.3 |
Recurring as % of total | 50% | 54% | 59% | 60% | 63% | 56% | 59% | 60% | 61% | 63% |
Sales growth (%) | 14% | 6% | -9% | -13% | 2% | 6% | -4% | 5% | 7% | 7% |
- Recurring sales growth | 6% | 15% | 1% | 1% | 10% | 9% | 5% | 7% | 9% | 10% |
- Ad hoc sales growth, subs | 29% | -12% | -8% | 1% | 59% | 8% | 9% | 4% | 5% | 3% |
- Ad hoc sales growth, others | 17% | 5% | -32% | -55% | -45% | -4% | -36% | 2% | 5% | 3% |
EPS growth (%) | 194% | -55% | -157% | -200% | -112% | -220% | -148% | -441% | 1% | 19% |
Gross margin | 78% | 76% | 73% | 74% | 74% | 75% | 74% | 74% | 74% | 75% |
Assumptions, fair value range | |||
Bear Case | Base case | Bull case | |
Value per share, SEK | 24 | 50 | 80 |
2023e-2027e | |||
Sales CAGR | 2% | 7% | 10% |
Total sales 2027 | 328 | 391 | 440 |
Avg EBIT margin | 4% | 8% | 11% |
EBIT margin 2027 | 6% | 11% | 15% |
EPS CAGR | 2% | 9% | 17% |
2027e-2031e | |||
Sales CAGR | 3% | 8% | 9% |
Average EBIT margin | 6% | 12% | 18% |
EPS CAGR | 3% | 10% | 15% |
Terminal EBIT margin | 8% | 13% | 18% |
WACC | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.5% |
People: 3
Nepa currently has an interim CEO, Ferry Wonswinkel. Ferry Wolswinkel was appointed Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) in September last year and has now been appointed interim CEO. He comes from a background of various commercial roles from e.g. Gartner, HP, Market Logic, and latest from Steetbees where he was VP Sales. Ferry chose to join Nepa because he was intrigued by the company’s strong history of growth despite never having had an active sales organization.
Board member, and previous CEO, Ulrich Boyer, still owns 19% of the company. The second largest owner is Elementa Fonder – a hedge fund with 16% of the shares. Elementa is quite active as an owner. In terms of institutional ownership, several well-known Swedish funds are found amongst owners.
In mid-2023, Elementa and Ulrich Boyer presented a new group of board members, all of whom with relevant backgrounds for Nepa's situation. The new board members include Adam Lytle and Carl-Fredrik Meijer. Lytle has a long history in private equity and today mainly works as an investor. Meijer is the CFO of Green Landscaping Group, a Sweden-based niche serial acquirer – with an impressive history of both growth and profitability.
Business: 4
Around 60% of Nepa’s revenues are recurring, and the remaining 40% are ad-hoc. However, customers with ongoing subscriptions occasionally order ad-hoc projects. Thus, revenues from customers with ongoing subscriptions constitute more than 80% of total revenues.
Historically, Nepa has had a very low and almost non-existent client churn. In the spring of 2020, during the outbreak of the pandemic, a few tourism-related customers paused their subscriptions. However, these customers quite quickly returned to normal subscriptions – even though their respective industries (and the companies themselves) were still severely hurt. We think this is a strong indication of the high stickiness of Nepa’s revenues.
Nepa enjoys market leadership in its core market, Sweden, where it has a ~50% market share for its core offering, i.e., its brand-tracking software. When it comes to procurements where Nepa is up against competitors, Nepa usually wins a very large percentage of these (as much as 90%, we have heard).
Nepa can grow with its customer in several dimensions – new markets, new modules, new customer groups, and new brands. The company aims to grow geographically along with its customers.
Financials: 2
Since its foundation in 2006, Nepa has had a long history of strong and consistent growth – except for 2009 and 2020, in which sales declined by 1% and 2%, respectively. 2009 was impacted by the financial crisis, whereas 2020 included Nepa completed a big restructuring program to improve profitability. Nepa has a solid sales CAGR of around 10% independent of which time period of the last ten years we measure.
Gross margin is high at almost 80% and has been slowly but steadily increasing for the last five years.
Before Nepa’s IPO in 2016, the company operated with a slightly positive EBIT margin. After the IPO, the company expanded unsuccessfully into the USA, which made Nepa unprofitable. In 2019, Nepa initiated a cost-cutting program and completed its turnaround in 2020. In 2021, profitability further improved – but mainly because Nepa didn’t invest in anything. The only focus was cutting costs and becoming a leaner organization.
In 2022, investments and sales efforts increased, ending up with a too-big cost base. This resulted in poor profitability which is now taken care of by cost savings. While the future profitability looks bright, the company needs to prove its profitability for several years in order to gain a higher score.
Income statement | |||||
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Revenues | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Cost of Revenue | 64.1 | 76.0 | 78.5 | 82.1 | 88.1 |
Operating Expenses | 181.1 | 205.3 | 214.4 | 184.9 | 199.1 |
EBITDA | 50.3 | 30.9 | 6.3 | 48.7 | 51.8 |
Depreciation | 10.2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Amortizations | 0.00 | 11.2 | 14.0 | 14.4 | 16.3 |
EBIT | 40.0 | 19.7 | -7.7 | 34.3 | 35.5 |
Shares in Associates | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Interest Expenses | 2.3 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Net Financial Items | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.80 |
EBT | 41.6 | 21.8 | -6.5 | 35.9 | 36.3 |
Income Tax Expenses | 3.0 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 7.4 | 7.5 |
Net Income | 38.6 | 17.5 | -8.4 | 28.5 | 28.8 |
Balance sheet | |||||
Assets | |||||
Non-current assets | |||||
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Property, Plant and Equipment (Net) | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.58 |
Goodwill | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Intangible Assets | 30.8 | 46.9 | 54.5 | 60.6 | 65.3 |
Right-of-Use Assets | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Non-Current Assets | 0.91 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Total Non-Current Assets | 32.6 | 48.9 | 56.4 | 62.3 | 67.0 |
Current assets | |||||
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Inventories | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Accounts Receivable | 79.1 | 76.3 | 65.8 | 69.4 | 74.6 |
Other Current Assets | 0.00 | 22.1 | 20.9 | 18.9 | 20.3 |
Cash Equivalents | 85.1 | 63.8 | 45.0 | 70.7 | 95.1 |
Total Current Assets | 164.1 | 162.2 | 131.7 | 159.0 | 190.0 |
Total Assets | 196.7 | 211.1 | 188.1 | 221.3 | 256.9 |
Equity and Liabilities | |||||
Equity | |||||
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Non Controlling Interest | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Shareholder's Equity | 102.8 | 109.7 | 101.3 | 129.8 | 158.6 |
Non-current liabilities | |||||
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Long Term Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Long Term Lease Liabilities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Long Term Liabilities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Non-Current Liabilities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Current liabilities | |||||
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Short Term Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Short Term Lease Liabilities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Accounts Payable | 23.5 | 27.6 | 26.9 | 28.4 | 30.5 |
Other Current Liabilities | 70.4 | 73.8 | 59.8 | 63.1 | 67.8 |
Total Current Liabilities | 93.9 | 101.4 | 86.8 | 91.5 | 98.3 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | 196.7 | 211.1 | 188.1 | 221.3 | 256.9 |
Cash flow | |||||
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Operating Cash Flow | 2.0 | 15.9 | 2.6 | 46.0 | 45.3 |
Investing Cash Flow | -10.6 | -27.5 | -21.5 | -20.3 | -20.9 |
Financing Cash Flow | 0.00 | -9.7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Disclosures and disclaimers
Contents
Investment thesis
Review of Q3
Subscriptions: Some churn from smaller clients, but positive efforts on ARPU and new sales
Ad-hoc revenues well ahead of expectations – especially to subscription clients
Cost base to be lower than SEK220m in 2024 – ahead of previous plans
SEK5.3 in net cash per share
Outlook: Lower cost base from Q1 – then focus on profitable growth
Changes to financial estimates
Valuation
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article