Xavi Solutions: Lays the Foundation for Future Profitability
Research Update
2023-11-13
09:39
Redeye takes a positive stance towards the cost-cutting initiatives, which seems necessary considering the company’s soft per-employee data. Solve had a rather solid quarter, while Serve saw a significant decline in sales. We raise our forecasts somewhat and leave our Base Case unchanged.
FN
JS
Fredrik Nilsson
Jacob Svensson
Contents
Review of Q3 2023
Sales: Hurt by Large Customers in Serve
Number of employees: Reductions in Overhead
Per employee and working day data: Soft Numbers
OPEX: Adjusted Number in Line with Expectations
Profit: Adjusted EBITDA and EBIT Below Forecast
Estimate revisions: Lowered Sales and OPEX Forecasts
Valuation
Investment thesis
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article
Net sales missed our forecast of SEK23.6m by 18% and amounted to SEK19.3m (24.2), corresponding to -20% growth y/y. Solve had a rather solid quarter as sales aligned with Q3 last year. On the other hand, Serve saw its sales decline by about 50% y/y. According to management, the soft development is due to two larger customers terminating their contracts. EBIT (adjusted for SEK 6.1m in restructuring costs) amounted to SEK-1.5m (SEK 0.5m), which resulted in an EBIT margin of -7.8% (2.0%), compared with our forecast of SEK 0.0m and 0.1%, respectively. While the adjusted OPEX roughly matched our forecasts, the lower sales than anticipated resulted in softer EBITDA and EBIT than expected.
Sales-COGS/employees/working day amounted to SEK2 681 (2 694) and was roughly flat y/y. For comparison, most profitable IT consulting firms had around SEK4 500 in this quarter – Q3 is typically lower than average due to vacations. Thus, Xavi probably has too high overhead costs and possibly a low utilization rate. Management’s statements of the company’s capacity to generate revenue being unaffected by the cost cuts (SEK7.7m in yearly csot cuts) Imply the reduction in headcount is mainly related to overhead – suggesting that is the reason behind the soft Sales-COGS/employees/working day. This should result in the Sales-COGS/employees/working day converging towards its profitable peers and taking Xavi Solutions to reasonable profitability.
We leave our Base Case at SEK 0.50 (0.50), as the positive impact from the forecast increases is offset by us raising the WACC following an increased risk-free rate. While Xavi Solutions is valued in line with the median peer for EV/EBIT 2024 and 2025, it trades at a ~50% discount on EV/Sales. Thus, if Xavi Solutions can improve its margins further than the 4-5% we expect in 2024-2025, in line with the peer average of 9%, for example, its EV/EBIT valuation multiple falls significantly.
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e |
Revenues | 118.0 | 103.2 | 103.7 | 113.5 | 128.4 |
Revenue Growth | -1.7% | -12.5% | 0.4% | 9.6% | 13.2% |
EBITDA | 2.3 | -5.8 | 6.6 | 8.8 | 11.2 |
EBIT | -29.9 | -8.5 | 4.1 | 6.1 | 8.2 |
EBIT Margin | -25.6% | -8.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | 6.4% |
Net Income | -32.1 | -8.9 | 2.9 | 4.5 | 6.2 |
EV/Revenue | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
EV/EBIT | -0.6 | -5.0 | 9.8 | 6.0 | 3.8 |
Xavi Solutions: Estimates versus actuals | |||||
Q3 23e | Q3 23a | Diff (%) | Q3 22 | Q2 23 | |
Net sales | 23.6 | 19.3 | -18% | 24.2 | 25.1 |
Growth y/y (%) | -2% | -20% | -3% | -13% | |
Sales-COGS/employee/working day | 2775 | 2681 | -3% | 2694 | 3356 |
Growth y/y (%) | 3% | 0% | 5% | -2% | |
Contribution/employee/working day | 315 | -250 | -179% | 329 | 107 |
Growth y/y (%) | -4% | -176% | -1% | -77% | |
OPEX | |||||
COGS | -4.6 | -3.0 | -34% | -4.5 | -4.9 |
Growth y/y (%) | 3% | -32% | 28% | -9% | |
Other external costs | -2.5 | -5.5 | 122% | -2.5 | -2.9 |
Growth y/y (%) | 123% | -32% | -16% | ||
Personnel expenses | -16.1 | -17.8 | 10% | -16.5 | -20.9 |
Growth y/y (%) | -3% | 8% | -7% | -2% | |
Earnings | |||||
EBITDA | 0.7 | -0.7 | -194% | 1.2 | -3.2 |
EBITDA margin (%) | 3.2% | -3.6% | 4.8% | -12.6% | |
EBIT | 0.0 | -1.5 | n.m. | 0.5 | -3.9 |
EBIT margin (%) | 0.1% | -7.8% | 2.0% | -15.4% | |
Source: Redeye Research (estimates), Xavi Solutions (historical data) |
Net sales missed our forecast of SEK23.6m by 18% and amounted to SEK19.3m (24.2), corresponding to -20% growth y/y. Solve had a rather solid quarter as sales aligned with Q3 last year. On the other hand, Serve saw its sales decline by about 50% y/y. According to management, the soft development is due to two larger customers terminating their contracts. However, the customers leave for structural reasons, taking the operations in-house or abroad. Thus, while hurting sales heavily, it should not be viewed as an indication of Serve doing a bad job.
Management sees potential for growth within Solve even in this somewhat soft market, with less customer demand and more available consultants, although profitability is the top priority. While Solve has a diversified exposure, its rather small operational units can be sensitive to rapid shifts in demand in local markets and sectors.
Regarding Serve, the situation is tougher. Losing two large customers in the current market environment, where we believe the demand for less specialized consultants like those in Serve so far has been softer than the more specialized consultants in Solve, for example, is tough. Thus, we do not expect any significant rebound in Serve short term.
Source: Redeye Research, Xavi Solutions
An IT consultant’s sales are a function of the number of employees and their revenues per working day. In fact, the number of revenue-generating employees, i.e., excluding administrative personnel, etc., would be a better measure. However, as those figures are not disclosed, we use the total number of employees as a reasonable proxy.
The average number of employees was 92 (98 including sub-consultants), down from 102 and 114 in Q2. While a lower number of employees typically suggests lower sales going forward in a consulting firm, considering Xavi Solutions low Sales-COGS/employees/working day (discussed below) and management’s statements of the company’s capacity to generate revenue being unaffected by the cost cuts, we believe the reduction in headcount is mainly related to overhead. Thus, we expect roughly flat sales and an improvement in Sales-COGS/employees/working day.
Source: Redeye Research, Xavi Solutions
The number of employees at the end of the quarter is a leading indicator for sales growth in the coming quarter. While sales are dependent on other parameters as well, the starting number of employees for the coming quarter is, together with the number of working days, the only relevant figures we know in advance.
Moreover, the difference between the average number of employees and the number of employees at the end of the quarter can give us a clue about the quarter’s employee churn, which is costly for any company. However, as sales generation and employees have nearly a 1:1 ratio among IT consultants, we believe employee churn is even more critical in such firms.
Sales-COGS/employees/working day was SEK2 681 (2 694) and was roughly flat y/y. For comparison, most profitable IT consulting firms had around SEK4 500 in this quarter – Q3 is typically lower than average due to vacations. Thus, Xavi probably has too high overhead costs and possibly a low utilization rate. As the new management focuses on reducing overhead costs, we assume that is the major factor behind the soft number. While the Serve segment likely somewhat lowers the number, considering our discussions with management, we get the impression that high overhead costs and high general costs are the main issue – i.e., the company is staffed for substantially larger volumes. From this perspective, the cost-cutting initiatives seem necessary to take the company into healthy Sales-COGS/employee/working day numbers.
The Contribution/employee/working day was SEK-250 (329), corresponding to a decrease of about SEK 580 y/y. While the personnel costs most likely are affected by the SEK 6.1m in restructuring costs, lowering the Contribution/employee/working day, considering the low Sales-COGS/employees/working day number, getting a solid Sales-COGS/employees/working day is more or less impossible. If Xavi Solutions succeeds in improving the Sales-COGS/employees/working day with the above cost reductions, the Contribution/employee/working day will follow.
Source: Redeye Research, Xavi Solutions
Sales-COGS/employees/working day is a proxy for the revenue generation of one employee during one working day, indicating how advanced services the company provides and how high its utilisation rate is. While sub-consultants and reselling software and hardware can affect the accuracy of this measure, we try to consider that by subtracting the cost of goods sold, which typically consists mainly of expenses related to sub-consultants and reselling. Also, as we use the total number of employees, the share of administrative personnel can alter the number. A high share of administrative personnel might not be unwanted. For example, when focusing on expansion, investments in administration are typically front-loaded.
Contribution/employee/working day is sales-COGS-personnel expenses and indicates the profit contribution for the average employee per working day. We believe it is a proxy of how much revenue consultants generate compared with their seniority and, thus, their salary. For example, a high sales-COGS/employees/working day might not be worth much to shareholders if most are paid as salaries to senior consultants.
Total OPEX amounted to SEK 17.2m (adjusted for SEK 6.1m in restructuring costs), came in somewhat below our forecast of SEK 18.6m, and was roughly flat y/y. As the split of restructuring costs between Personnel costs and Other external costs is undisclosed, it is difficult to comment on the deviations relative to our forecasts. However, the cost reduction initiatives are expected to cut costs by SEK 7.7m annually, which should take Xavi Solutions to profitability, considering the quarter’s sales and adjusted OPEX.
Source: Redeye Research, Xavi Solutions
EBITDA (adjusted for SEK 6.1m in restructuring costs) was SEK -0,7m (SEK 1.4m), corresponding to an EBITDA margin of -3.6% (4.8), compared with our expectations of SEK 0.7m and 3.2%. At the same time, EBIT (adjusted for SEK 6.1m in restructuring costs) amounted to SEK-1.5m (SEK 0.5m), which resulted in an EBIT margin of -7.8% (2.0%), compared with our forecast of SEK 0.0m and 0.1%, respectively. While the adjusted OPEX roughly matched our forecasts, sales was 18% lower than expected, resulting in a softer EBITDA and EBIT than anticipated.
We lower our sales forecast by 15% for 2024 and increase our EBITDA and EBIT forecasts by about SEK 5m for the following reasons:
We forecast an EBIT margin of 4% and flat sales growth in 2024.
Xavi Solutions: Estimate revisions | ||||||
2023e | Old | Change | 2024e | Old | Change | |
Net sales | 102.0 | 109.5 | -7% | 102.5 | 120.4 | -15% |
Growth y/y (%) | -12% | -6% | 0% | 10% | ||
Sales-COGS/employee/working day | 3299 | 3277 | 1% | 3601 | 3422 | 5% |
Growth y/y (%) | 2% | 1% | 9% | 4% | ||
Contribution/employee/working day | 75 | 394 | -81% | 625 | 553 | 13% |
Growth y/y (%) | -84% | -16% | 734% | 40% | ||
OPEX | ||||||
COGS | -19.2 | -22.7 | -15% | -17.5 | -22.9 | -24% |
Growth y/y (%) | -14% | 1% | -9% | 1% | ||
Other external costs | -13.5 | -10.9 | 23% | -9.1 | -11.5 | -21% |
Growth y/y (%) | 12% | -9% | -32% | 5% | ||
Personnel expenses | -76.4 | -77.0 | -1% | -70.5 | -85.3 | -17% |
Growth y/y (%) | -5% | -4% | -8% | 11% | ||
Earnings | ||||||
EBITDA | -5.8 | 0.1 | n.m. | 6.6 | 1.9 | 245% |
EBITDA margin (%) | -5.7% | 0.1% | 6.4% | 1.6% | ||
EBIT | -8.5 | -2.7 | n.m. | 4.1 | -1.0 | n.m. |
EBIT margin (%) | -8.4% | -2.5% | 4.0% | -0.8% | ||
Source: Redeye Research |
Xavi Solutions: Financial forecast | ||||||||
2022 | Q1 23 | Q2 23 | Q3 23 | Q4 23e | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e | |
Net sales | 116.6 | 31.0 | 25.1 | 19.3 | 26.6 | 102.0 | 102.5 | 112.3 |
Growth y/y (%) | -2% | -5% | -13% | -20% | -14% | -12% | 0% | 10% |
Sales-COGS/employee/working day | 3237 | 3502 | 3356 | 2681 | 3756 | 3299 | 3601 | 3717 |
Growth y/y (%) | 4% | 1% | -2% | 0% | 10% | 2% | 9% | 3% |
Contribution/employee/working day | 471 | 582 | 107 | -387 | 682 | 75 | 625 | 792 |
Growth y/y (%) | 5% | -12% | -77% | -218% | 49% | -84% | 734% | 27% |
OPEX | ||||||||
COGS | -22.4 | -7.2 | -4.9 | -3.0 | -4.0 | -19.2 | -17.5 | -17.5 |
Growth y/y (%) | -3% | 10% | -9% | -32% | -32% | -14% | -9% | 0% |
Other external costs | -12.0 | -2.7 | -2.9 | -5.5 | -2.4 | -13.5 | -9.1 | -9.9 |
Growth y/y (%) | -3% | -14% | -16% | 123% | -20% | 12% | -32% | 9% |
Personnel expenses | -80.2 | -19.5 | -20.9 | -17.8 | -18.2 | -76.4 | -70.5 | -77.4 |
Growth y/y (%) | -2% | -8% | -2% | 8% | -14% | -5% | -8% | 10% |
Earnings | ||||||||
EBITDA | 2.3 | 1.8 | -3.2 | -6.8 | 2.3 | -5.8 | 6.6 | 8.8 |
EBITDA margin (%) | 2.0% | 5.9% | -12.6% | -35.2% | 8.6% | -5.7% | 6.4% | 7.8% |
EBIT | -29.9 | 1.2 | -3.9 | -7.6 | 1.7 | -8.5 | 4.1 | 6.1 |
EBIT margin (%) | -25.6% | 3.9% | -15.4% | -39.3% | 6.3% | -8.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% |
Source: Redeye Research (estimates), Xavi Solutions (historical data) |
We leave our Base Case at SEK 0.50 (0.50), as the positive impact from the forecast increases is offset by us raising the WACC following an increased risk-free rate.
While Xavi Solutions is valued in line with the median peer for EV/EBIT 2024 and 2025, it is trading at a ~50% discount on EV/Sales. Thus, if Xavi Solutions can improve its margins further than the 4-5% we expect in 2024-2025, in line with the peer average of 9%, for example, its EV/EBIT valuation multiple falls significantly.
Case
A Swedish IT consulting group ready to scale up
Evidence
The transformation is starting to materialise
Challenge
In need of coveted employees
Challenge
Will it succeed in transforming into a profitable IT consultancy?
Valuation
Low EV/S does not reflect its potential
People: 3
Xavi Solutions receives an average rating within the People rating judging by the qualities of its management, board members and owners, as well as its actions and track record. The CEO, Margareta Strandbacke, has a solid background in the IT industry and the CEO position. The board has relevant and complementary expertise, including entrepreneurial skills and experience from publicly listed companies and within the IT industry, which we like. To achieve a higher score in the future, we want to see management executing its current strategic plan to a greater extent.
Business: 3
Xavi Solutions achieves an average score in the Business category due to several aspects. First, Xavi Solutions offers clear value creation for its customers by increasing their competitiveness and efficiency through digital solutions and applications adapted to their day-to-day operations. Second, IT consulting firms are generally stable cash flow-generating businesses that create value for their shareholders. And third, with its niche focus on digital/tech, structural trends are driving the market, while there is a pent-up need for the right skills in the market that means higher underlying demand than the market growth figures suggest. However, to improve this rating in the future, we want to see Xavi Solutions grow its business with stable profitability while taking a larger market share.
Financials: 1
Xavi Solutions receives a lower rating for Financials than for the other two categories, and the main reason is that this category takes into account several years of history. We argue that Xavi Solutions is undergoing a strategic shift to a pure IT consulting business that has affected its historical continuity. Therefore, it takes time to affect the historical figures measured in this category because of its lagging characteristics. However, we believe that Xavi Solutions will continue to grow its business and achieve stable profitability, which may mean a higher rating in this category in the future.
Disclosures and disclaimers
Contents
Review of Q3 2023
Sales: Hurt by Large Customers in Serve
Number of employees: Reductions in Overhead
Per employee and working day data: Soft Numbers
OPEX: Adjusted Number in Line with Expectations
Profit: Adjusted EBITDA and EBIT Below Forecast
Estimate revisions: Lowered Sales and OPEX Forecasts
Valuation
Investment thesis
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article