Lytix Q4 2023: All Eyes on Verrica’s Phase II

Research Update

2024-03-04

12:58

Lytix's partner Verrica fully recruited its phase II study in basal cell carcinoma in January, with a topline readout expect in H1 2024. This will be a major catalyst that can change the investment case. Lytix will focus the future development of LTX-315 on the neoadjuvant instead of refractory setting, which increases its sales potential, but will also mean a longer time to the market.

RR

Richard Ramanius

Contents

Investment thesis

Quality Rating

Outlook for LTX-315

Developments in melanoma

Financial Results

Valuation

Financials

Rating definitions

The team

Download article

Verrica phase II

The last patient in the phase II study in basal cell carcinoma was dosed in January. 80 patients have now been enrolled. Verrica expects to complete the study and publish topline data in H1 2024, earlier than planned. We are impressed by the speed with which Verrica is conducting this trial. The next milestone from this programme is due upon initiation of phase III, which has not yet been planned. Strong results in the phase II study would be a significant catalyst and significantly change the investment case for Lytix. It would move our base case closer to our bull case, making LTX-315 in basal cell carcinoma (Verrica) the most valuable programme.

LTX-315

A full readout from ATLAS-IT-05 was presented in the webinar on Thursday 29, with 1 partial response, 8 stable disease and 11 progressive disease patients. This corresponds to a disease control rate of 45 percent and an overall response rate of 5%. The key opinion leader, dr Robert Andtbacka, said this was a good result in this challenging patient population that has already received multiple treatments and is essentially end-stage. We also believe this shows LTX-315 in combination with pembrolizumab can have an effect in this patient group, stabilising the disease and contributing to prolonged survival. However, we believe more studies would be needed before a partner might be interested in this particular indication, showing prolonged progression-free survival or overall survival rather than focusing on responses, as in this study. This is likely why Lytix will not add another 20 patients but will focus on ATLAS-IT-06 next, which will begin in H1 2024, recruiting 27 patients with an interim readout in H1 2025.

Base Case NOK13

We have made major changes to our valuation model (discussed below in this update), with larger peak sales for LTX-315 and a longer time to market (we have added three years). The positive and negative changes counteract each other leading to a similar overall valuation as before, but we assume more dilution due to a lower share price. We judge the company will raise around NOK90m by H1 this year. Our base case is NOK13 (NOK14).

Key financials

NOKm202220232024e2025e2026e
Revenues17.310.26.313.0231.5
Revenue Growth-33.1%-40.7%-38.5%107%1678%
EBITDA-65.7-96.8-70.7-45.9173.3
EBIT-65.7-96.9-70.7-45.9173.3
EBIT Margin-380%-2427%nm.-405%74.8%
Net Income-56.0-87.9-70.7-45.9173.3
EV/Sales9.657.6nm.37.50.9
EV/EBIT-2.5-2.4-5.4-9.21.2

Investment thesis

Case

Basa cell carcinoma may become the most valuable project in 2024

Lytix is developing unique first-in-class oncolytic molecules with little competition in its class. An ongoing phase II of LTX-315 (ATLAS-IT-05) with melanoma patients who progressed after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors has recruited 20 patients who are given LTX-315 + pembrolizumab (a checkpoint inhibitor). A second investigator-sponsored trial in the neoadjuvant setting (ATLAS-IT-06, n=27), which is very cost-effective, with PD-1 starting in H1 2024 will significantly increase the market potential and be the way forward for LTX-315. The company’s second oncolytic molecule, LTX-401, soon phase I ready, is designed for deeper lesions and provides follow-up potential. Finally, Verrica will communicate topline data in their phase II study of LTX-315 in basal cell carcinoma by mid-2024. Strong results would make this the most valuable programme and likely lead to the start of a phase III trial in 2025 together with a milestone. This represents a large and differentiated market (dermatology).

Evidence

LTX-315 can shrink superficial and metastatic lesions

The main candidate LTX-315 demonstrated stable disease in nine patients and a partial response in one for a disease control rate of 45% (out of 20 patients) in the full readout (ATLAS-IT-05); this is encouraging considering patients failed on average two previous lines. Superficial lesions decreased more. Lytix has outlicensed LTX-315 to Verrica for dermatological cancers (except melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma) in a deal worth up to USD114m plus royalties, which provides external validation. In Verrica's phase II study of basal cell carcinoma at the highest dose, full tumour clearance was reported in four patients, 95% in the fifth and 30% in the sixth, which is a strong result. The company has a class-leading international scientific advisory board including Nobel Laureate (2018) Jim Allison, which has helped Lytix design the phase II trial in refractory melanoma and provided clinical sites (MD Anderson).

Challenge

Success in ATLAS-IT-06

Although the results from ATLAS-IT-05 are compelling, they may not turn out strong enough to lead to a licensing deal. The next phase II trial in neoadjuvant melanoma (n=27) will have to generate strong enough data to warrant a subsequent phase III or phase IIb trial, and do it without substantial delays. Together with Verrica's phase II study and ATLAS-IT-05, Lytix may have a good data package by 2026 which will assist partnering discussions.

Challenge

Dilution

Lytix is only financed until mid-2024. Unless non-dilutive funding can be obtained, the company will have to raise money within the next couple of months, leading to some dilution.

Valuation

LTX-315, Verrica deal and LTX-401

We value LTX-315 in the main indication of neoadjvuant melanoma and in metastatic melanoma as a subindication. We include a licensing agreement worth USD600m (USD50m upfront and 13.5% in royalties) in 2026. For LTX-401, we include a licensing agreement worth USD300m (USD9m upfront and 12% in royalties). We value the deal with Verrica separately. Using a WACC of 15% and assuming some dilution due to NOK90m being raised in 2024, our base case is NOK13. The cash position of cNOK50m should last to mid-2024.

Quality Rating

People: 3

Lytix has a management team that has been working together for a long time and a long experience of its technology platform. Inside ownership from management is limited, however. The shareholder structure provides solidity to operations, as two major shareholder are represented on the board (33%) and there is a sizeable group of long-term oriented owners.

Business: 3

Pharmaceuticals is a high-margin industry in which there is clear product protection for companies' projects through patents. It is generally a non-cyclical industry. For research companies like Lytix, the situation is different, with risks associated not just with clinical development but also with the (cyclical) stock market, where capital requirements are large and often handled via new issues. 

Financials: 0

As of Q4 2023, Lytix had a cash position of cNOK50m, which finance operations into mid-2024, before which additional capital will have to be raised. Being a research company, it will likely take some time before becoming cash flow neutral.

Outlook for LTX-315

In December 2023, the clinical trial application for ATLAS-IT-06 in neoadjuvant melanoma was submitted to the regulatory authorities for approval. The trial is set to begin in H1 2024. It will recruit 27 patients with clinically detectable and resectable stage III-IV melanoma, which is the same stage as ATLAS-IT-05, although ATLAS-IT-06 will be tilted towards stage III and ATLAS-IT-05 towards stage IV. Furthermore, the patients in ATLAS-IT-05 are end-stage, having, on average, received several treatments; their cancers have more resistance mechanisms, and their immune systems are in worse shape. The ATLAS-IT-06 patients will be anti-PD-(L)1 naive.

In our opinion, the most logical setting for LTX-315 is as an adjuvant (after resection) or neoadjuvant (before resection) treatment. We therefore agree with Lytix switching focus to ATLAS-IT-06, which has the benefit of costing very little for Lytix as it is investigator-sponsored. The data from ATLAS-IT-05 will contribute to the overall data package supporting further development. Late-stage melanoma might be an indication expansion in the future. The data from Verrica’s phase II study will also be illustrative, even if the cancer type is different.

Checkpoint inhibitors have not been approved as neoadjuvant treatments in melanoma, only as adjuvant treatments. Most recently (December 2021), pembrolizumab was approved in high-risk stage II melanoma as an adjuvant treatment. However, there is much data suggesting treatment before resection rather than after improves event-free survival. One study investigated neoadjuvant plus adjuvant pembrolizumab versus adjuvant pembrolizumab in stage III-IV melanoma (SWOG 1801/ NCT03698019), a study which is likely similar to ATLAS-IT-06. The event-free survival at two years was 72% in the neoadjuvant versus 49% in the adjuvant group. This shows that initiating checkpoint treatment before, rather than after, surgery can improve survival.

Cancer recurrence is very common in stage III after resection. Therefore patients are also treated pharmacologically. The scientific rationale for neoadjuvant treatment is that leaving the tumour intact and treating the cancer before resection will activate the immune system when large amounts of tumour material is available. After resection, there is often some tumour material left, including potentially micrometastases, which may be so small that they are not detected by the immune system even with checkpoint immunotherapy. Another advantage is that it allows for prognostication based on the initial response to therapy since not all patients respond.

Adding LTX-315 to pembrolizumab as a neoadjuvant treatment would have a dual effect: (a) it would reduce the tumour size before resection, and (b) it would act as a cancer vaccine, which could help the immune system kill of any remaining cancer cells, including micrometastases. Some patients with a complete pathological response might even avoid surgery completely. Cancer vaccines have shown greater potential in earlier stages of disease when there is less tumour burden. For example, a promising phase III trial is underway with a personalised cancer vaccine (mRNA-4157) combined with pembrolizumab in stage II-IV melanoma patients. Furthermore, melanoma is one of the most mutated cancer types, where one would expect a vaccine to work best. We are, therefore, very positive about Lytix transitioning LTX-315 to neoadjuvant melanoma. We believe this is where LTX-315 fits best. It is also an economically sound decision, as the situation for raising cash in the capital markets is still challenging, even if it is improving. Adding another 20 patients would likely cost some tens of millions of NOK. Lytix will need more cash, but it will need much less now when it focuses on ATLAS-IT-06 which is funded by the investigator. Lytix only has to provide LTX-315 material.

Developments in melanoma

Melanoma is a cancer area with much ongoing activity with some developments impacting LTX-315, so the right positioning of the candidate compared to competitors is important. There may be some competition in the refractory space from Imlygic, the only approved oncolytic virus in melanoma, which is combined with pembrolizumab in a phase II study for the treatment PD-1 refractory patients. Lifileucel (Amtagvi), an autologous tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy from Iovance, was granted accelerated approval in refractory melanoma in mid-February this year. The indication is late-stage melanoma previously treated with a PD-1 inhibitor (and potentially a BRAF or MEK inhibitor). This is likely the same (or very similar) indication for which LTX-315 is positioned with the ATLAS-IT-05 study, being the melanoma indication with the highest unmet need. LTX-315 has previously been tested with autologous TILs in ATLAS-IT-04 in other types of cancer with promising early results.

The launch of lifileucel (Amtagvi) has already been strong with 20 patients signed on for treatment (according to Endpoints News). Analysts expect full-year sales of USD180m in the US with 350-385 patients treated. The treatment cost has a list price of USD515,000. Expansion into the EU is planned in H1 2024. Lifileucel is also being investigated as a first-line treatment in combination with pembrolizumab. We believe combining LTX-315 with Lifileucel would be a strong fit in both the first and second lines. LTX-315 has now been tested both with pembrolizumab and TIL therapy, so we expect no tolerability issues, even for a triple combination. The efficacy results are also encouraging, so it should be interesting for Iovance to test if LTX-315 can potentiate lifileucel, which would improve its market position. However, negotiating a partner deal might be tricky as the potential for LTX-315 is likely much larger in early-stage melanoma, and Iovance is a moderately sized biotech company with a market cap of USD4.4bn with somewhat limited resources (compared to large pharma). But it would be logical for the companies to collaborate, and we believe Lytix is trying to do this.

Financial Results

Revenue amounted to NOK5m in the period, deriving from the ‘SkatteFUNN’ R&D tax incentive for LTX-315. Lytix' application was approved in October and makes the company eligible for up to NOK14.3m in non-dilutive funding from 2023 to 2025. Operating costs, NOK-25m, increased somewhat compared with the previous quarter (NOK-23m). The operating cash flow in the period was NOK-28m. The cash and cash equivalents position decreased to NOK51m, which should last into mid-2024. We estimate the company will raise around NOK90m before then.

Valuation

We have removed the previous potential indication expansions of TLX-315, assuming Lytix will focus on skin cancer in various settings in the foreseeable future. We have added three years to the development time of LTX-315 in stage III-IV refractory melanoma, with a potential market entry in 2032 (2029). We have decreased the market penetration to 12% (20%) because of the delay to make room for the potential entry of new competition in the meantime. We have also decreased the expected costs for this trial. Since the potential market of LTX-315 expands with neoadjuvant treatment, we have increased the deal package to USD600m (USD500m). Of the USD600m deal value, we assume USD150m will pertain to the refractory indication and USD450m to the neoadjuvant setting.

We assume both LX-315 and LTX-401 will be out-licensed in 2026 instead of 2025. We have also increased the development costs for LTX-401. This leads to a lowering of its valuation.

We have included neoadjuvant melanoma as the main indication of LTX-315. We have based our forecast on patients with stage II and III with adjuvant therapy assuming that a proportion of these would go over to neoadjuvant treatment in the future. These are around 70 000 patients per year in the US and 60 000 in EU5, or around three times as many as second-line advanced patients.  

We believe pricing will be lower than in metastatic disease, as the treatment period will be shorter. In NeoLIPA, patients will be treated for nine weeks before surgery, including three infusions of pembrolizumab. Therefore, we project a cost per patient of USD40,000 in the US and 65% of this in other countries. We assume a market share of 20%. This results in a peak sales value of USD1,550m, or around twice the previous number in advanced disease.

Based on the favourable results shown in metastatic melanoma (ATLAS-IT-05), we use the same likelihood of approval (13%) in the trial in neoadjuvant melanoma. Based on the mechanism of action and theory, we would expect LTX-315 to work better in the neoadjuvant setting, but this remains to be proven empirically.

Common endpoints in neoadjuvant trials are relapse-free survival (after two years), distant metastasis-free survival, and overall or melanoma-specific survival. Instead of ORR (based on radiology), pathologic response is used (using tissue samples). The primary endpoint of NeoLIPA will be pathologic complete response rate. The exact development path for LTX-315 to the market has not yet been defined, but we believe a phase III study would likely take around four years to complete or more. If such a study starts in 2027, we expect LTX-315 could be on the market in 2032. LTX-315 has a patent in combination with checkpoint inhibitors expiring in 2035, but five years extra would likely be granted (until 2040); there might also be additional patents filed.

All these changes constitute a significant revaluation of Lytix, but the effect on our sum-of-the-parts valuation is minor, with a slightly lower fundamental value owing to a smaller cash position and a lower valuation for LTX-401. Since the share is price lower than in our last update, which should lead to capital having to be raised with more dilution, our new base case decreases by NOK1 to NOK13. We forecast around NOK90m will be raised.

ProgrammeIndicationLoARoyaltiesPeak SalesEst. launchDeal SizerNPV
(USDm)(USDm)(NOKm)
LTX-315 (neoadjuvant)Melanoma13%14%15502032450528
LTX-315 (refractory)Melanoma13%14%4702032151
VerricaBCC20%12%3802028114252
LTX-401HCC4%12%780203430091
Project value (NOKm)1022
Net cash51
Shared costs incl. tax (NOKm)-330
Fair value (NOKm)742
Shares outstanding 40
Value per share (NOK)19
Fully diluted13
Source: Redeye Research

Our new bull case is NOK25. It assumes a positive readout for Verrica increasing the LOA to 44%; it also assumes a slightly positive readout for LTX-315 in adjuvant melanoma in H1 2025, increasing the LOA to 16%. Our new bear case of NOK6 assumes failure in all projects except LTX-315 as a neoadjuvant treatment.

Financials

Income statement
NOKm20232024e2025e2026e
Revenues10.26.313.0231.5
Cost of Revenue-6.3-6.3-1.70.00
Operating Expenses107.177.058.958.3
EBITDA-96.8-70.7-45.9173.3
Depreciation0.000.000.000.00
Amortizations0.000.000.000.00
EBIT-96.9-70.7-45.9173.3
Shares in Associates0.000.000.000.00
Interest Expenses0.000.000.000.00
Net Financial Items8.90.000.000.00
EBT-87.9-70.7-45.9173.3
Income Tax Expenses0.000.000.000.00
Net Income-87.9-70.7-45.9173.3
Balance sheet
Assets
Non-current assets
NOKm20232024e2025e2026e
Property, Plant and Equipment (Net)0.110.110.110.11
Goodwill0.000.000.000.00
Intangible Assets0.000.000.000.00
Right-of-Use Assets0.000.000.000.00
Other Non-Current Assets0.002.32.32.3
Total Non-Current Assets0.112.42.42.4
Current assets
NOKm20232024e2025e2026e
Inventories0.000.000.000.00
Accounts Receivable12.80.001.938.1
Other Current Assets0.000.000.9118.5
Cash Equivalents50.561.818.0231.9
Total Current Assets63.361.820.8288.5
Total Assets63.464.223.2290.9
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
NOKm20232024e2025e2026e
Non Controlling Interest0.000.000.000.00
Shareholder's Equity51.460.714.8188.0
Non-current liabilities
NOKm20232024e2025e2026e
Long Term Debt0.000.000.000.00
Long Term Lease Liabilities0.000.000.000.00
Other Long Term Liabilities0.000.000.000.00
Total Non-Current Liabilities0.000.000.000.00
Current liabilities
NOKm20232024e2025e2026e
Short Term Debt0.000.000.000.00
Short Term Lease Liabilities0.000.000.000.00
Accounts Payable0.000.003.776.1
Other Current Liabilities12.13.64.726.7
Total Current Liabilities12.13.68.4102.8
Total Liabilities and Equity63.464.223.2290.9
Cash flow
NOKm20232024e2025e2026e
Operating Cash Flow-96.9-68.7-43.8213.9
Investing Cash Flow0.020.000.000.00
Financing Cash Flow2.380.00.000.00

Rating definitions

The team

Disclosures and disclaimers

Premium Plan required to unlock

Unlock companies to access

more high quality research.

Contents

Investment thesis

Quality Rating

Outlook for LTX-315

Developments in melanoma

Financial Results

Valuation

Financials

Rating definitions

The team

Download article